What are Asia’s top ranked universities and how did they get there?

0
206


TIMES Higher Education (THE) released its Asia-Pacific (APAC) University Ranking 2018 earlier this month. In the respected league table, East Asian countries continue to dominate the region’s higher education sector.

Japan had the most number of universities featured (89) while China came second with 63 universities. South Korea and Taiwan had 27 and 31 institutions represented respectively.

The region’s top university is once again the National University of Singapore, followed by China’s Tsinghua University and Peking University.

SEE ALSO: Singapore’s universities teach the same course to prepare students for future

Asia-Pacific
rank 2018
World University
rank 2018
UniversityCountry/region
1=22National University of SingaporeSingapore
230Tsinghua UniversityChina
3=27Peking UniversityChina
432University of MelbourneAustralia
540University of Hong KongHong Kong
=644The Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong Kong
=652Nanyang Technological University, SingaporeSingapore
848Australian National UniversityAustralia
965University of QueenslandAustralia
1058Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong
1161University of SydneyAustralia
1246The University of TokyoJapan
13=80Monash UniversityAustralia
14=74Seoul National UniversitySouth Korea
=15=95Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)South Korea
=1585University of New South WalesAustralia
17=74Kyoto UniversityJapan
18=137Pohang University of Science and TechnologySouth Korea
19=111University of Western AustraliaAustralia
20=111Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)South Korea
21=119City University of Hong KongHong Kong
22=134University of AdelaideAustralia
23132University of Science and Technology of ChinaChina
24116Fudan UniversityChina
25=169Nanjing UniversityChina

What makes these institutions the region’s cream of the crop?

The rankings are based on the same performance indicators as the THE World University Rankings 2018, though the methodology has been adjusted account for APAC’s rising young universities.

Over 250 universities from 13 nations were analysed based on these five broad areas: Teaching (the learning environment); Research (volume, income and reputation); Citations (research influence); International outlook (staff, students and research); and industry income (knowledge transfer).

Each area was assigned its own weighting:

Teaching (the learning environment): 25 percent

This refers to the “perceived prestige” of institutions in teaching based on the annual Academic Reputation Survey. This includes how committed an institution is to nurturing the next generation of academics, as well as the number of postgraduate research students, among others.

Research (volume, income and reputation): 30 percent

This looks at “universities’ role in spreading new knowledge and ideas”. To do so, THE referred to  the average number of times a university’s published work is cited by scholars worldwide.

“The citations help to show us how much each university is contributing to the sum of human knowledge: they tell us whose research has stood out, has been picked up and built on by other scholars and, most importantly, has been shared around the global scholarly community to expand the boundaries of our understanding, irrespective of discipline,” according to the website.

shutterstock_375506494

(File) Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences at the National University of Singapore. Source: EQRoy/ Shutterstock

SEE ALSO: These are the most innovative universities in Asia

International outlook (staff, students, research): 7.5 percent

This refers to how attractive a university is to global prospective undergraduates, postgraduates and faculty. This is calculated from the proportion of a university’s total research journal publications that have at least one international co-author and reward higher volumes.

Industry income (knowledge transfer): 7.5 percent

How much a university helps industry with “innovations, inventions and consultancy”. THE’s website explains this as such: “This category seeks to capture such knowledge-transfer activity by looking at how much research income an institution earns from industry (adjusted for PPP), scaled against the number of academic staff it employs.”

A version of this article originally appeared on our sister site Study International.

Source link