Home Blog Page 3727

COE prices end mostly higher in latest bidding exercise

SINGAPORE – Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices in the first round of bidding this month closed mostly higher today (June 8).

Only motorcycle premiums dropped marginally from $6,303 to $6,302.

Premiums for Category A – cars up to 1,600cc and 130bhp – went up from $47,020 to $53,694.

Premiums for Cat B – cars above 1,600cc or 130bhp – rose from $49,156 to $56,000, while those for Cat C – goods vehicles and buses – saw an increase from $43,002 to $46,434.

COE prices for the open Cat E – for any vehicle type but ends up mainly being used mostly for bigger cars – jumped from $49,700 to $55,100.

huizhen@sph.com.sg

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Wednesday, June 8, 2016 – 16:37
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Rewritten Story

Source link

Discount on NTUC FairPrice wholegrain rice as war on diabetes steps up

The supermarket chain will offer a 5 per cent discount on its housebrand wholegrain rice for three months.

Source link

Warcraft star: I was walking around like a weirdo

This is not the usual start to an interview.

In an elaborate throne room set-up at the Universal Studios backlot, the combination of cables and different level dais has already seen me narrowly avoid a pratfall.

Still, I think US actress Paula Patton found it charming. Well, she laughed.

I was facing the three leads of new fantasy epic Warcraft: The Beginning – Patton, Australian actor Travis Fimmel and Brit Toby Kebbell.

Opening here tomorrow, it is based on the video game World Of Warcraft and was in production hell for close to a decade until English director Duncan Jones came along.

The film centres on an invasion by orcs into the human realm of Azeroth. Each side has its different factions, with the actors before me representing these sides, as well as different stages of costuming.

Fimmel, 36, most famous for his stunning turn in the TV series Vikings, plays armour-clad Sir Anduin Lothar, the Alliance protagonist.

Kebbell, 33, is noble orc chieftain Durotan.

With his character being motion capture – something Kebbell was used to, thanks to his role as the treacherous Koba in 2014’s Dawn Of The Planet Of The Apes – he got to turn up for work in “grey pyjamas”.

I suggest that Patton, 40, as half-human-half-orc Garona who is caught between the two sides, had the worst deal. She needed hours of make-up and had to master wearing prosthetic tusks.

“It was good for us to be around,” said Fimmel, with a sly look.

LEATHER AND TUSKS

Patton’s costume, she pointed out, was for the most part “a few bits of leather”.

But those tusks – not the monster-sized horns of other orcs – still needed some getting used to without dribbling.

“I needed to stretch out my bottom lip, so I would wear them around the house, make it fit my mouth and not sound ridiculous when I spoke,” she said.

And when some of your co-stars don’t have the hassle of costumes, it can cause resentment.

“I hate them,” deadpanned Fimmel, referring to the orc cast.

“They walk in, draw dots on their faces. At the end of the day, they take it off with a wet wipe and they’re gone.”

He added laconically: “I don’t like orcs at all, to be honest.”

Fimmel shrugged off the fact that his get-up was so heavy that it took the help of four people to put on and three to take it off, as he was dealing with a much more troublesome aspect.

“I got more annoyed with the wig. Wigs are so itchy,” he said.

Kebbell also had character issues.

To play an orc of that size required a different way of walking that apparently needed more stomach than a regular gait.

“I was walking around Vancouver (where Warcraft was filmed) like a weirdo, but there’s a lot of them there,” he said.

“And hey, Travis was in town, so nobody was paying much attention to me.”

And did this serious-minded epic make for a dour experience on set?

“These two are very serious,” joked Fimmel.

“I think we were macho only when Paula was on set,” admitted Kebbell.

“Then we were suddenly talking about (adopts gruff voice) ‘Oh yeah, I lifted a house… I’m so strong.'”

Pointing at Fimmel, he added: “But just before that we were talking about our favourite teas and cake. I love cupcakes and he likes Battenberg.”

While Fimmel joked about hating orcs, Jones told M in a separate interview that sure enough, Warcraft’s different factions had a “natural division” when it came to down time on the set.

Unlike other cast members who are huge fans of the source, the main trio had not touched the game. So what attracted them to dressing up for the movie?

“Duncan Jones” is the reply that came from all, so quickly it is almost harmonised.

“And I had always wanted to meet Toby,” teased Fimmel.

For Patton, the best thing about being in a fantasy film is living in an alternate reality.

“I live for that. The worst thing is the lull, the in-between time,” she said.

With more than 100 million players over its 22 year history, World Of Warcraft has many fans who will be scrutinising this film adaptation very closely – something the cast are keenly aware of.

Kebbell, especially, has had run-ins with poorly-received game adaptations before.

“I didn’t read the script and think ‘this feels like a computer game’, and I’d done that before. I was on (2010’s) Prince Of Persia (The Sands Of Time),” he said.

“This was different. I was very aware that this is a great film with a great director and a great cast.”

Director Jones a Warcraft fanboy

It’s been a long five-year wait for the return of Duncan Jones.

After the successes of Moon (2009) and Source Code (2011), the 45-year-old was tipped to be the next big director.

Then he got into Warcraft: The Beginning and seemingly disappeared.

“It hasn’t been five years just on this movie. For the first year and a half, I was trying to make something else. But then this unique opportunity came along,” he told M.

Jones admitted to being a fanboy. He’s played World Of Warcraft since it came out in 1994 and jumped at the chance to solve the production hell puzzle the movie adaptation languished in.

Original director Sam Raimi could not find the magic to make Warcraft owners Blizzard give the green light.

“There’s a long history of people making video game movies where they don’t get what the fans love about them,” said Jones.

“But that’s changing. Similar to how comic book movies are now good because the people making them grew up reading comics, there’s a generation of film-makers who grew up on video games.”

What next?

“I’m going to do a much smaller film – still sci-fi – that I’ll be shooting in Berlin.

“It’s a passion project that I’ve been looking to make for 14 years.”

CONNECTION

The location for Mute, which is in preproduction, has a strong connection to Jones. His dad, the late singer David Bowie, made three iconic albums in the German city during the 70s.

Not having used his father’s name for his career, did he have second thoughts about those who can’t see past the “Bowie’s son returns to Berlin” headlines?

“Well, I grew up there. So I have my own experiences. It’s a very unique city, a cultural melting pot and where East meets West. It’s the Casablanca of the future.”

Jones fits a similar profile of directors Rian Johnson, Gareth Edwards and Colin Trevorrow, all now attached to Star Wars films.

But he has no intention to be part of the Lucasfilm club just yet.

“I feel fortunate. Avenues open up if you make decent films, but you don’t get many chances to start those kind of franchises,” he said.

“With Warcraft, I’m getting to establish one. I’d rather do that than join a pre-existing franchise.”

jonrob@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 08, 2016.
Get The New Paper for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Thursday, June 9, 2016 – 06:00
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Story Type: 
Others

Source link

Director James Wan 'rejects' F&F sequel for The Conjuring 2

Until he made last year’s action blockbuster Fast & Furious 7, Australian-Chinese film-maker James Wan was primarily a horror movie helmer, best known for kickstarting the movie franchise Saw.

He is also the director of the Insidious films and 2013’s supernatural sleeper hit The Conjuring, which had the largest opening ever for an original horror movie.

The US$20 million (S$27 million) spookfest eventually went on to make US$318 million worldwide.

Wan picked its sequel to direct over the Fast & Furious follow-up Fast 8, refusing a “life-altering” amount of money in the process to do so.

It’s no surprise, because of the toll that F7 took on Wan’s health, dealing with leading men Paul Walker’s shocking death and Vin Diesel’s difficult personality.

We are at the Four Seasons hotel in Beverly Hills to talk about The Conjuring 2. He is thrilled to return to another story of real-life husband-and-wife team of paranormal investigators, Ed and Lorraine Warren, (Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga).

The couple travel from the US to Enfield, North London, to help a single mother (Frances O’Connor) raising four kids in a house plagued by malicious spirits.

It opens here tomorrow.

Looking much younger than his 39 years, diminutive Los Angeles-based Wan has an energetic, upbeat personality, waving his arms as he makes a point. He sports a shirt patterned with clocks, his tousled dark hair tipped with blond. His next project is the highly- anticipated DC Comics superhero spin-off Aquaman (2018).

You were born in Kuching, Sarawak, and lived in Malaysia till you were seven, then moved to Australia. Do you have any memories of your time there?

It’s mainly of trips where I go back to visit. I have relatives back there. I just love going back and experiencing the culture that is so different from Hollywood. And on top of that, my favourite thing to do in Malaysia is eat. I am not ashamed to say this, but I love durian (laughs). I don’t think it smells, I think it smells amazing. It’s my favourite fruit.

You had a priest come and bless The Conjuring 2 set before you started shooting this movie. Why was that?

(Laughs) I think we did it because even though on the first movie, I didn’t experience any of it, there were a few spooky things that happened to some cast and crew. I don’t know whose idea it was to bring in a priest… Listen, nothing bad happened, the shoot was very smooth and maybe the blessing worked.

The first movie was under the radar, yet became a huge success. Do you feel pressure going into the second one to deliver similar results?

Oh my gosh, a lot of pressure. Especially coming after Fast & Furious 7, there was a lot of speculation as to why I decided to go back to do (The Conjuring 2). I was very anxious about the sequel when I knew how much people loved the first one. So believe me, the cloud of the first movie hung over me for the entire production. But I think that was great. It made me keep pushing myself, not just in the storytelling but in my film-making as well.

Not many directors successfully break out of the genre they are known for.

That is what is annoying about Hollywood – if you are good at one thing, they just want you to keep doing it because they think that is all you are good at and they want to make as much money as they can from you in that one area.

I love the horror genre and it’s been very kind to me.

But having said that, I love all kinds of films and I really want to take the opportunity to go and do other things… But now I think after I have proven myself with F7, I wasn’t as worried about coming back to another “scary movie”.

And moving forward, the doors are kind of wide open for me to branch out.

I was attached to the MacGyver property back when it was supposed to be a feature film and so I stuck around with it and now it’s going to be rebooted as a TV series again which is very exciting.

And Aquaman is percolating away in the background.

tnp@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 08, 2016.
Get The New Paper for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Thursday, June 9, 2016 – 06:00
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Story Type: 
Others

Source link

COE premiums close mostly higher in latest bidding exercise

The biggest increase was in the B Category, which rose to S$56,000 from S$49,156 in the previous bidding exercise.

Source link

Traffic Police clerk sold private details for $200 each to law firm employee

An unknown man turned up at his door shortly after he made a police report about a traffic accident he was involved in.

The man then told Mr Haresh Vishindas Chandiramani that his contact details had been given out by someone at Traffic Police for a fee.

Enraged, he chased the man away.

But the incident repeated itself after he was involved in another traffic accident a year later.

Again, an unknown person contacted him and asked him if he wished to seek compensation.

Incensed, Mr Haresh reported the matter to a senior Traffic Police officer.

Investigations revealed that it was a Traffic Police clerk, Khatijah A. Manap, who had leaked his details, along with the details of 22 others, to a law firm, Clifford Law.

Khatijah earned about $200 for each contact who went on to engage the firm, netting at least $2,500 between August 2010 and February 2013.

Yesterday, Khatijah, 61, pleaded guilty to five charges under the Official Secrets Act and three under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Her co-accused, Gulzar Raja Singh Sandhu, a legal executive from Clifford Law, is also facing charges.

Court papers said that Khatijah was involved in a traffic accident in 2008 and was referred by a relative to Raja’s daughter, who was a lawyer and also from Clifford Law.

Raja, who was in charge of meeting and interviewing clients of the law firm, later heard from his daughter that Khatijah was a clerk in the Traffic Police’s investigation branch.

He approached Khatijah at her workplace sometime after June 2010, after she had received her payout from her accident claims.

Raja asked her if she wanted to work with him by selling the contact details of people involved in traffic accidents.

He offered her $200 for each contact who engaged his law firm.

Khatijah thought about it and accepted the offer a few days later.

She would randomly identify traffic accident victims from investigation papers that she handled and jot their particulars down on a separate piece of paper.

CONTACT NUMBERS

Each time, she would gather about four or five names and contact numbers and pass the information to Raja over the phone before disposing of the paper.

Raja would meet her at her void deck or the roadside near his daughter’s Siglap home to hand over the money after the accident victims engaged his firm.

Between August 2010 and February 2013, they targeted 23 people.

One of them was Mr Haresh, who was approached twice – in March 2012 and February 2013.

Khatijah, claiming to be an “Azizah” from Clifford Law, would phone him and tell him he could seek compensation for the accident.

She would also advise him to consult Clifford Law and arrange a meeting with a paralegal, who was actually Raja.

On the second occasion, Mr Haresh called Khatijah’s office line – having earlier got her number when he called Traffic Police to make an inquiry into his new accident case – and demanded to know why she passed his number to an outsider.

Khatijah revealed she was actually Azizah.

Mr Haresh warned her that what she did was wrong and he made a police report.

Investigations were unable to confirm the total amount Khatijah pocketed, but her bank statement showed that Raja had transferred $2,500 into her account, court papers said.

The case was adjourned to July 11 for mitigation and submissions on sentence.

For each charge under the Official Secrets Act, Khatijah can be jailed up to two years and fined up to $2,000.

For each charge of corruptly receiving money, she can be jailed up to five years and fined up to $100,000.

rloh@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on June 08, 2016.
Get The New Paper for more stories.

Image: 
Publication Date: 
Wednesday, June 8, 2016 – 21:00
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Story Type: 
Others

Source link

COE premiums rise in all categories, except motorcycles

SINGAPORE – Certificate of Entitlement (COE) premiums closed mostly higher at the end of the first COE bidding exercise this month on Wednesday (June 8).
Here are the results at a glance:
Cat A (Cars up to 1600CC & 97KW): S$53,694 (up from…

Source link

Thailand explainer: Behind the Tiger Temple's walls

Here are answers to interesting questions about the controversial Tiger Temple.

The origins of the Tiger Temple

Wat Pha Luang Ta Bu Yannasampanno was founded in 1994 in Sai Yok district of Kanchanaburi province. It was named after an esteemed monk, Luang Ta Bu Yannasampanno, who was abbot of Wat Ban Tad in Udonthani Province. His teachings were passed down to the present abbot, Luang Ta Chan.

Why is it called the ‘Tiger Temple’?

The temple received its first tiger in 1999, and two years later the number of resident animals increased to eight. As of May 31, shortly before wildlife authorities began a relocation operation at the temple compound, it housed 147 tigers and the cubs of the Bengal and Indochinese species, allegedly bred in the temple.With a number of apparently tame tigers, as well as other animals including Asian bears, hornbills and jackals, the temple became a tourist attraction. It offered up-close and personal contact with the animals, giving visitors the chance to take photos and feed the animals in exchange for payment.

Why has the temple become controversial?

The monks and animal caretakers have long been accused of mistreating animals, as well as illegal breeding and even being involved in wildlife smuggling, as has been allegedly indicated by evidence revealed in the recent relocation operation. A number of tiger cub carcasses were discovered, as well as engraved fangs and other talismans made of animal parts.

How did authorities from the Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation get involved in the issue?

The department confiscated tigers at the temple in 2001 for the first time, but due to sensitivity concerning relocation and immense opposition, it came to an agreement with temple members to leave the tigers under their care. However, the number of tigers at the temple grew to 147 before the latest relocation effort, while the temple could not explain their origins.

The department attempted to relocate tigers twice earlier this year. It managed to relocate 10 to care facilities outside the temple, leaving 137 to be relocated during the latest effort that started on May 31.

In the past year, the issue of international wildlife trafficking came into the spotlight again after wildlife authorities were told three adult tigers had disappeared from the temple. A complaint was filed with the police, which is now under investigation.

Are the tigers registered?

According to the department, they are confiscated items and under the department’s supervision. People possessing tigers – which are protected animals under the 1992 Wildlife Act – without permission could face up to four years in jail or a fine up to Bt40,000, or both. Tigers are also listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) Appendix I, meaning they cannot be traded or exported in any form.

The temple, meanwhile, had only been granted a licence to operate a zoo, not to possess the animals.

Why are the tigers being moved out of the temple this time?

The department has to enforce the law or otherwise it would face Article 157 of the Criminal Code for negligence of duty. It’s also obliged to provide good care for wild animals.

What will happen to the tigers?

The department said the tigers would first be relocated to its two main breeding centres in Ratchaburi. If the tigers prove to be Indochinese, they may be rehabilitated and released in the wild, if strong enough. Bengal tigers cannot be released in the wild. Wildlife widely recognise that tamed animals rarely survive if reintroduced into the wild.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Wednesday, June 8, 2016 – 15:33
Keywords: 
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Rotator Image: 
Story Type: 
Others

Source link

NCMP Leon Perera steps down from The Independent Singapore's advisory board

“I have decided to take this additional step to ensure that any perceived link to TISG does not distract public attention when policy positions are taken by the Workers’ Party,” the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament says.

Source link

Singapore rises to 18th place in expat cost of living survey

Singapore is now the 18th most expensive city worldwide for expats, and the 10th most expensive in the Asia Pacific, according to a survey by ECA International. 

Source link