Home Blog Page 1927

Brave man who defended StarHub staff from abuse turns out to be the creative director at Ubisoft

0

We’re no strangers to incidences of abrasive people yelling at others in public.

The incidents are usually recorded by smartphone-wielding bystanders, and these silent observers are usually lambasted at on social media, with many asking why they chose to simply stand around rather than offering their help there and then.

There are of course many reasons as to why someone would choose that over helping the poor fella(s) in the situation (Too dangerous? Getting hold of incriminating video evidence against the culprit is a better approach? Person recording is actually an aspiring director?), but what actually stands out is how non-confrontational – to a fault – many of us can be.

Sure, there’s that one person (or a few) recording an incident who is rendered helpless, but in many cases with a sole hero emerging to save the day, many bystanders remain firmly rooted at the ground they’re standing on, remaining as, well, just bystanders.

Another one of these videos has emerged, and the roles of antagonist/troublemaker, protagonist/hero, victim, and cameraman were once again reprised.

The StarHub Incident

In the video, we see the man in the light grey shirt behaving barbarically and yelling vulgarities the other man, and a hapless StarHub staff trying to ease the situation.

Throughout the commotion, as one man got more angry, the other simply stayed calm.

As the video made its way across all Facebook newsfeeds, the hero himself, now identified as Justin A. Farren, posted a comment sharing his POV and thoughts:

As compared to concurring with the negative (often toxic) sentiments shared by netizens who have watched the video, Farren urged them to give the man some sympathy, and to appreciate that “things like this are rare in Singapore”.

Photo: Screenshot

He still asserted, though, that the abuse was uncalled for.

Not Just Another Everyday Hero

Given the very public nature of Facebook, many soon realised that Farren wasn’t just another everyday hero – he also has a day job as Creative Director at video game publisher Ubisoft.

For the unacquainted, some of the more popular games (that even non-gamers would have heard of) from Ubisoft include Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry, Rainbow Six, and Watch Dogs.

What’s admirable is not just how Farren bravely confronted the aggressor, but how even after having vulgarities (and spit) hurled at him, maintained a clear-headed view of the situation – spreading a message that calls for understanding over naming-and-shaming, an unfortunate hallmark of many cases of citizen journalism.

Regardless of his job, Farren has set an example for many of us to follow the next time we’re confronted with a situation like this.

Vulcan Post is all about living life with a digital edge, up and coming startups, and people who inspire conversations.
Visit Vulcan Post for more stories.

Image: 
Category: 
Publication Date: 
Saturday, February 11, 2017 – 11:19
Send to mobile app: 
Source: 



Story Type: 
Others

Source link

44-year-old SAF regular serviceman loses consciousness in Pasir Laba Camp, dies in hospital

0

 

SINGAPORE – A 44-year-old Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) regular serviceman died after losing consciousness in Pasir Laba Camp on Friday (Feb 10) morning.

Second Warrant Officer (2WO) Sim Poh Wah lost consciousness in the camp, which is in the Joo Koon area, at 7.53am, Mindef said in a press release on Friday.

2WO Sim was taken to Pasir Laba Camp Medical Centre, and later to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (NTFGH).

Medics and an SAF medical officer continued their attempts to resuscitate him on the way.

The SAF ambulance arrived at NTFGH at 8.45am, but 2WO Sim was pronounced dead at 9am.

“Mindef and SAF extend their deepest condolences to the family of the late 2WO Sim,” said Mindef in its release.

SAF is assisting his family in their time of grief.


This article was first published on Feb 11, 2017.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Category:
Publication Date:
Saturday, February 11, 2017 – 11:25
Send to mobile app:
Source:

Story Type:
Others

Source link

Leave property cooling measures for the HDB, not high-end market: Rhonda Wong, CEO, Ohmyhome

0

SINGAPORE: Rhonda Wong is the co-founder and CEO of Ohmyhome, and sees her business as fulfilling a social mission for homebuyers across Singapore.

But as a platform for HDB sellers and buyers, landlords and tenants to transact directly with each other, it is one that has naturally not gone down well with the traditional middlemen – Singapore’s property agents. It touts itself as being able to save people thousands of dollars in agent fees. Listing your property on the app is free too. And if you need an agent, Ohmyhome has them, but they charge a flat fee of S$2,888.

The app was launched in May last year and since then it has seen a 7 per cent week-on-week increase in the number of users, and 10 to 30 listings secure buyers or tenants each month. They have also reported more than S$10,000 in savings for clients in some cases, and swift sales with a HDB flat-seller recently successfully securing a buyer within 2 days of listing.

Wong started off as a treasury bonds trader before she set up Anthill Realtors, a real estate consultancy firm serving investors. One of her motivations, she says, is to have enough money to pursue her dream of full-time volunteering and helping impoverished communities around the world.

She went “On the Record” with Bharati Jagdish about her business philosophy, property cooling measures and how it all started for her.

Wong: I love numbers and trading was very natural for me. I loved watching the screens. I love looking at patterns and it’s exciting. But over time, it stopped being exciting because when the news came on, for me, it became just about things like how much does this affect my portfolio, how much would my bond prices go up or down, how does it affect the futures market. And I found it quite meaningless over time because since I was a child I always wanted to be a volunteer and when I grew older I wanted to be a doctor. So it was very different from the core of what I loved to do.

Bharati: I understand you still do volunteer work, but why didn’t you pursue your dreams of being a doctor? 

Wong: That’s a good story actually. I told my mom when I was going to university that I wanted to study medicine and she said: “Why? Your science is not that great.” I said it was because I wanted to help people. I wanted to save people. And then mom said that if you are a doctor you can only save one person at a time, so why don’t you try doing a business with which you can help a lot of people at the same time, or engage a team of doctors to go with you to support your cause. 

Then I went to business school.

A TEAM OF “DOCTORS” HELPING PEOPLE

Bharati: How do you see your business as being a team of doctors helping people?

Wong: It’s a business that reaches out and helps people. In the past, a lot of people had no choice when it came to selling their homes or buying their homes. They had to engage an agent and they had to pay market rates – one or two percent of the price of the HDB flat which is usually hovering around $4500 to $9000 per transaction. And that’s very costly for an average family. They can use this money for a lot of things; even travelling, that they are not able to afford.

It’s amazing. They’ll tell us, “thank you so much. You’ve saved us money and I’ve used this money for my child’s violin lessons.”

Now they can because with Ohmyhome you get to connect directly with the buyers or sellers, landlords or tenants without having to pay the agent. We give step-by-step tips to simplify the process of doing the transaction on your own and that is one way that we hope we can help by reaching out to 82 per cent of Singaporeans.

Bharati: Do you ever regret the decision you made not to become doctor though?

Wong: I don’t usually look back and regret things, but I do need to move on when I’m not enjoying what I do and that’s why I found myself moving on trading even though I loved it a lot. It made good money, the lifestyle was great, short working hours but I found myself moving away from it because the joy, the meaning behind was no longer there.

Bharati: How was moving into property more meaningful for you?

Wong: Previously, I worked in larger agencies and I thought that by joining a large agency I would learn the insights of the business. I would have first-hand information. I would be able to be a very effective and knowledgeable agent, a salesperson. But I realised the market isn’t so. The market, the industry teaches you how to close deals quickly, how to be a good salesperson. So you become good in the sense of closing deals, but not good in the sense of being informative and helpful to the clients to achieve their goals.

It wasn’t like that and that’s why I started Anthill Realtors because I wanted a company that focuses on achieving clients’ goals and not just make money. It’s not because we don’t want to make money. It’s because we believe that by focusing on the clients’ goals, we will make more money because clients will stick with you, they’ll be loyal and they will recommend people to you.

A MOTHER’S INFLUENCE

Bharati: What would you say has shaped your philosophy about these things?

Wong: Maybe upbringing. I have a very kind mom and dad, especially my mom. She’s always generous, very kind, always helpful to people who are in trouble, whether it’s her employees, her friends and family. My mom is always someone who tries her best to help and by helping I don’t always mean financially because we were not always well-to-do growing up and mom would just try her best.

If somebody’s child needs caring for, she’ll help. If somebody’s uncle is unwell she’ll be at the hospital taking care of him. So that’s the kind of parent who set a good example for me over the years and because of that, it’s very natural for me.

Bharati: You actually helped your parents too in their business. They ran a photo shop. What was growing up like for you?

Wong: I recently had a conversation with my dad about this because in my memory, I actually worked very hard helping out at the shop since I was 8-years-old. While my friends were at birthday parties on the weekends, at chalets and doing all sorts of fun things, I had to be at my dad’s shop cutting the films and running around bringing the films to be processed. But my dad said, “you think you were really hardworking, but I didn’t think so because we really needed help and you were reluctant to come to work.”

Bharati: How did that make you feel, after all these years, to hear your dad say that?

Wong: My dad is a very hardworking man. He’s someone who really came from nothing. His dad passed away when he was really young and he didn’t have (an) education so I was wasn’t surprised that he felt so because what we think is hard work is very different for him. For him, hard work is really physical labour and working endlessly and not sleeping. For us it’s skipping a birthday party. So when he said that, I thought, okay, I know. I’ll try harder.

Bharati: How did your parents manage to finance your overseas education or were you on a scholarship?

Wong: No, I wasn’t on a scholarship. I guess I wasn’t smart enough. When I was in secondary school, I was planning to go to either the UK or America to study. And my mom told me we don’t have enough. She said, “Rhonda, I’m sorry you are not able to go now but I’m going to start a joint-account with you and I’m going to start saving and I promise you that at 18, you’ll get to go. I remember it was really touching when she one day showed me the bank statements and she said, “Now you have enough. You can go now.”

Bharati: She saved all this money just from the photo business?

Wong: Yes. Mom is someone who doesn’t spend on herself. She’s always spending on others and I grew up being like her. I actually don’t shop. But I spend on people that I love. I guess it’s not always about money. The drive is always there whether I make money or not. One day if I were to do something that doesn’t make money, I would still be as hardworking. I don’t see that changing but money helps you do a lot of things. Money helps you provide your kids with a better education. Money helps you build a school for people who don’t have access to schools. Growing up, even though there were times when we were poor, we never felt poor. I always had love from my parents. I have two elder sisters. They dote on me a lot, so I never felt poor. That’s why I realise today as an adult that feeling rich or poor is not about what you have materially. It’s about family. It’s about love. It’s about giving. 

DEALING WITH THE WRATH OF PROPERTY AGENTS

Bharati: However, I’m sure at this time, because of the nature of your business, some property agents in the market feel like you’re taking away from them rather than giving.

Wong: We have resistance from agents in the market for sure. They don’t like us because they feel that we’re taking away their rice bowl. 

Bharati: They’re not wrong, are they?

Wong: I guess they’re not wrong to a certain extent, but I always feel if you’re really good at your job, no one can take it away from you. So you just have to keep evolving and being better. You have to add value and you don’t want to be one of those whom customers complain about.

Bharati: You mentioned earlier that your agents only charge a flat rate of $2888. How did you even arrive at that figure?

Wong: We arrived at that figure because we wanted to make sure that at the average price of an HDB flat, we still save for the customers. But there’s only so much that the company can subsidise before we really run a huge loss every single day.

We have to be sustainable and that’s how the amount comes about. We know that at that price, we can afford to pay our agents, we can afford to pay for their transportation and get your work done as well. After we launched, on news articles on Facebook, we can see a lot of comments where they say, “there’s no way an app can replace agents.”

Today, that is true and this is why we have our own team of agents. So there are two groups of agents. One group that’s completely against us and one group that’s very supportive of us. So the group that’s against us will keep writing bad comments, leaving us bad testimonials and giving us one-star ratings. And then we have those who love us and they’ll actually write to us and say, can I join your team?

You’ll see that agents who join our team are not money-minded. If they were, they wouldn’t be in our team. They are people who believe in this move. They believe in the move towards efficiency, technology and doing something new and different.

Bharati: A lot of people are also asking why the transaction process is complicated in the first place to warrant agents. What’s your assessment? Is it simple enough actually for everybody to do it themselves? Is it just a mental block that is preventing people from exploring the DIY option for themselves?

Wong: It depends first on whether you can read. If you can read English, then I think what’s preventing you from doing it is probably a mental block. If you go to the HDB website or if you go to Ohmyhome’s website, as long as you can read, we guide you through step-by-step. HDB has an awesome guide for anyone who wants to do this whole process themselves. The process is lengthy but it’s not complicated.

Bharati: It’s cumbersome. Do you think the authorities can make it less so and perhaps should look into it.

Wong: Yes, definitely, but HDB has regulated it to be this way which is a lengthier process than the private market and this is why we’re helping the HDB market first. It’s just more steps. With HDB there’s a resale checklist. There are HDB appointments that you have to go to. So yes, it can be made simpler. While Ohmyhome wouldn’t be able to make it simpler in terms of the steps, we can make it simpler by helping you with the steps so you can do it on your own. 

Bharati: You charge a flat rate for clients who want to use an agent from your team and that’s how you make your money. But how do you make money off people who don’t want to use an agent, who really just want to do the whole thing themselves. 

Wong: If they just go on the app, if they post a listing or they contact the owner directly because their looking for a flat, it’s completely free. We don’t make money. When the day comes that clients do everything on their own on the app and I make zero money from the property business, that’s the day when I think my business would have really succeeded.

Bharati: But you’ll be making zero money.

Wong: Making zero, but down the road, we can make money by for example, bringing on different services. For example if you plan to spend $15,000 on buying furniture or renovating your home, what if we can get that for you and instead, the furniture or renovation company pays us for connecting you. So that’s something we will explore. We want to make it a one-stop-shop so anything related to your transaction whether it’s legal, mortgage, renovation, movers – we want to put that in the app and we want to help you go through the whole journey. We don’t want you to have to search for each of these things yourself or get a quotation for every service. We’ll do that for you. 

DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REPLACE EXISTING MODELS

Bharati: Many have said that in spite of disruptions in several sectors, few disruptive technologies or business models will be able to replace the existing players. Do you agree?

Wong: I agree. We see more and more people shifting towards transacting online and the reason is that people are getting more and more used to getting information online. Today, if we have any questions, we do a google search. So there is this shift, but there will also be people who love the personal human touch and that’s where technology needs a balance so do you still have a hotline with a human answering or is it a robot answering. At Ohmyhome, we always have a human answering so I think that’s the balance that we need to strike while being efficient, being advanced in technology. Then there’ll be others who just don’t want to put in the work to do it themselves, so agents will still come into play. 

Bharati: What is your business philosophy in terms of turning your ideas into reality like this?

Wong: I mentor a lot of students and they always ask us how we came up with the idea and I always encourage people in the sense that in everyday life, when you encounter problems, you actually already have the beginnings of an idea. It’s just that you take no action on it to come up with a solution. For example, when the bus is late, you will always think, “I wish it was on time.” When something is expensive you’ll say, “I wish it was cheaper.” And all these are solutions and ideas you can work on. If you want to make something cheaper, work on it. Try to make it cheaper and that’s how you turn it into reality instead of just complaining about it. But what many people don’t know is that your complaints are actually ideas that can help a lot of people because a lot of people are experiencing the same problem. 

Bharati: Taking that step can be quite challenging.

Wong: Yes, very challenging.

Bharati: So how do you manage to get past that?

Wong: I’m not special. I get past that the same way that everyone gets there. We just work very hard and there is no shortcut to it. I think every founder whom I’ve read about, every successful person – the story is the same. Everyone works very hard and of course there the smarter ones and there the not-so-smart ones. The smarter ones go faster and the not-so-smart ones are slower but they get there. You need to have that drive and passion because if your drive is very short-sighted, it’s very difficult to last that long. Every single day, I spend most of my day working whether I’m pregnant, whether I have a child, I’m working all the time.

Bharati: Why do you work so hard?

Wong: There’s just a greater purpose beyond myself and I always tell people if you have hands and legs and you have a healthy brain, a healthy and able mind and body – this is something that many people in this world dream to have. If you were born and grew up in Singapore, I think there are millions of people out there who wish to be in your position. So if you don’t do the best that you can then you’re letting down all these people who wish they can be in your shoes just having a good life, good air, clothes, shelter just normal things in life. But we’re so engrossed in being brought up in the city that we forget that there are all these people in this world and every day we take it for granted. Every day that I’m alive, I have to do my best.

YOUR CUSTOMERS CAN HELP YOU EVOLVE

Bharati: A lot of people – businesses and workers in general – are facing a lot of challenges in today’s economy and some not able to cope very well with it. What’s your advice to them?

Wong: Treat your customers well. I always believe in that. If you treat your customers well, they will be honest with you even on the day when they choose not to support you. So if you treat your customers well, first of all, they will always support you. They will tell their friends, their family. They’ll tell the whole world about you. They’ll Instagram you. They’ll Facebook about you. They will do free marketing for you. But there might come a time when they decide that they’re not going support you. Maybe because you’re getting too expensive. But when that day comes, because they have been a good customer of yours, they will tell you that. They will be honest and that’s something good because you should listen to your most loyal customers and they can help you evolve. But if you choose to be stubborn and stuck in your old way and you don’t want to evolve, that’s where the problem comes because we keep moving. Everyone keeps moving. Nobody’s going to wait for you.

ON PROPERTY COOLING MEASURES

Bharati: I can’t let you go without getting your take on the current property market. A lot has been said about cooling measures. What’s your stance on this?
Wong: I can see the government’s point of view to make homes more affordable, but my take is make those homes affordable for first-time homebuyers – people who are buying their first home with their savings from their first 10 years of work. They probably wouldn’t be buying homes that are five million dollars. So have measures in place for the lower end of the market. For the higher end of the market, five million dollars and up, maybe even three million and up, I don’t find cooling measures necessary. In fact I think that we should allow the flow of funds from overseas and from local players who want to make money from real-estate because these people are not affecting the first-time homebuyers. These people are not investing in the same kind of property. So with HDB and with the first-tier of the private market, I would say, yes keep it controlled. Make sure that everyone has a home to live in but with the expensive properties, I don’t see a need to cool it.

Bharati: Affordability is key if you’re a first-time homebuyer, but shouldn’t these individuals also have the opportunity or be given a fair chance to profit from their purchases and to advance into the higher end of the market? If we go by what you said, the rich will only get richer and everyone else will be left by the wayside.

Wong: I hear so much of that now because with “Ohmyhome” our HDB clients who are trying to sell, say the prices haven’t moved in the past five years. But you have to take the good and the bad. The good thing is you got to buy it at an affordable rate and the bad thing is you’re still selling it at the same price. I think maybe with government housing, profit shouldn’t be the purpose. Providing affordable housing was always the building block of our nation. I think to use HDB to profit would be the wrong starting point.

Bharati: But you mentioned foreign buyers as well. Why should they be allowed to make money off the market here or to live in luxury in Singapore while these properties remain out of reach of most Singaporeans?

Wong: Again it’s two sides of the fence. If you don’t have the foreigners coming in to help you push up prices then you will not be seeing huge profits will you? You’ll be seeing moderate increments, a few percent a year if it’s just driven by Singaporeans. So if you want profits, you should welcome the foreigners. I have a trading background so I believe in natural market forces. Even in trading you should be allowed to long and short. You shouldn’t only be allowed to long the market but in a lot of markets you are not allowed to short the market which means it’s unnatural. So with property, I think it’s the same. You should allow people to buy and sell because they can or because they cannot. So they sell because they need the money back. They buy because they feel that they can afford to buy. They can upgrade.

Bharati: But wouldn’t you say the run-away prices that we saw when natural market forces were reigning, were concerning, preventing many Singaporeans from upgrading?

Wong: Yes. So maybe there should be a permanent moderate measure throughout. You can take measures such as in Australia. For example, as a foreigner there, you can only buy “off the plan” purchase and you cannot buy existing stock. And when a foreigner wants to sell, they can only sell to a local so this by itself is already a permanent measure to keep the property market stable. As a result of this, foreigners are not able to keep buying and churning property. So these are the types of measures we can look at without being very drastic. Right now, the ABSD has been relatively drastic. 

Bharati: You have called yourself, in past interviews, “a small-time property investor”. How “small- time” are you?

Wong: Well, “small-time” relative to the people we serve in Anthill Realtors who can buy buildings. We’re just buying a few units here and there. I have a few in Singapore and a few in Malaysia. One in Australia. It’s between my sister, Race and myself. Race is my partner. We decided that if we buy one property a year, in 10 years we will have 10 properties and we can collect rent and do whatever we like. So that’s how it started.

Bharati: We’ve been talking today a lot about your business. Any parting advice to people who at this point might be struggling in their business?

Wong: Be strong. You have to be very strong. Markets will go up and down and even if you survive this round, you may not survive the next round. So be strong. Be adaptable and don’t give up on yourself. A lot of times you may think that you and your business are one. That means if your business fails, you fail too. But the truth is, it’s not. If this business fails and you have the courage to close it down because you know that it’s coming to an end, I would say that it’s a brave move. You can always do something else.

If you have the right attitude, you can always do something and be successful again, but don’t be afraid. Don’t feel that if you’ve failed today, you’ve failed forever. And don’t be afraid to let your current business go in order to start something new. It’s not easy. We are always sentimental about our businesses. We’ll think we’ve done this for this many years. We’ve spent this number of hours in the shop, in the business. So it takes a lot of courage to say, hey, you know what? This is not working out. I’m going to close it and do something else. It takes courage. 

Source link

Certis Cisco officer dies after being knocked down by a car while trying to divert traffic at Tuas Checkpoint

0

 

SINGAPORE – A 33-year-old on-duty Certis Cisco officer died on Friday morning (Feb 10) after he was knocked down by a car while trying to divert traffic at Tuas Checkpoint.

The accident happened at about 2.30am, and Lance Corporal (Auxiliary Police Force) Norman Samri was taken conscious to the National University Hospital where he died an hour later from his injuries.

A police spokesman said the 28-year-old male driver of the car was arrested for causing death by rash act and investigations are ongoing.

The Malaysian driver, who is believed to have been drink-driving, was arrested on the spot.

The Straits Times understands that when the accident happened, LCP Norman and two other auxiliary police officers (APOs) had been diverting traffic from the first lane of the three-lane road of the departure viaduct as a minor accident had occurred there.

The car was believed to have been speeding and swerving between lanes and did not slow down when it approached the APOs.

ST understands the trio tried to jump out of the car’s way, but LCP Norman was hit and landed a distance away.

He suffered head injuries and died later in hospital.

When contacted, an Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) spokesman said: “The ICA extends our deepest condolences to the family of the late officer and is working with Certis Cisco to provide necessary assistance to the family.”

The ICA spokesman added that she was unable to comment further on details of the accident as police investigations are ongoing.

Certis Cisco’s top management including President and Chief Executive Officer Paul Chong and Commander, Deputy Assistant Commissioner (DAC) Chua Chuan Seng, visited the officer’s family on Friday afternoon.

DAC Chua said: “Certis Cisco deeply regrets the passing of LCP (APF) Norman Samri. We will be providing assistance and support to the bereaved family. “We are working with ICA and SPF in their investigations into the incident.”

tammei@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on Feb 10, 2017.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image:
Category:
Publication Date:
Saturday, February 11, 2017 – 10:20
Send to mobile app:
Source:

Story Type:
Others

Source link

Toto Hongbao draw: 4 lucky winners share $12 million

0

 

SINGAPORE – Four winners shared the $12 million prize in Friday’s (Feb 10) Toto Hongbao draw.

The winning numbers – 07, 29, 02, 27, 24 and 34, with an additional number 21 – were announced at 9.30pm, after days of anticipation that saw punters queueing up at Singapore Pools outlets around the island, with some picking spots that are considered “luckier”.

The winning tickets were sold at the following outlets:

  • Block 11A, Boon Tiong Road, via a QuickPick System Roll Entry
  • Singapore Pools Hougang N3 Branch at Block 322, Hougang Avenue 5, 01-70 via a QuickPick System 7 Entry
  • Singapore Pools, B1-143, Suntec City Mall, via a QuickPick System 7 Entry
  • NTUC FairPrice Serangoon Central Hypermart at 23, Serangoon Central, 03-42, Nex via a QuickPick Ordinary Entry.

The final amount for the draw is $12,001,648.

To accommodate demand, Singapore Pools extended operating hours of its outlets.

The draw was carried out at the Singapore Pools Building at 210 Middle Road, where 320 people gathered. It was accompanied by lion dance performances at 41 outlets islandwide.

A 50-year-old punter, who would give his name only as Mr Ng, said it was the first time he made his way down to watch the draw.

“I came for fun,” he said. “I spent quite a bit but it’s also the first time I bought so much.”

A 78-year-old retiree, who wants to be known only as Mr Low, told The Straits Times he won about $50. “When the pot is small, I buy less. This time I spent a few hundred dollars because the pot is bigger.”

Punters may have been enticed by last year’s draw, which saw a record prize pot of $13.9 million.

Last year’s two winning tickets were bought at a Livewire outlet at Marina Bay Sands and Ng Teo Guan Self Service at Block 301, Ubi Avenue 1.

To play Toto, punters pick at least six numbers between 1 and 49.

Each draw yields six winning numbers and an additional number, and punters are guaranteed a cash prize if at least three of their chosen numbers are included in the six winning ones.

To win the jackpot (Group 1 prize), all six chosen numbers must match the winning ones. The jackpot can be shared among multiple winners.

lydialam@sph.com.sg

abigailng@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on Feb 10, 2017.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Check out services page for lottery results.

Image:
Category:
Publication Date:
Saturday, February 11, 2017 – 09:49
Keywords:
Send to mobile app:
Source:

Rotator Image:
Story Type:
Others

Source link

NLB explains rationale behind naming new museum Syonan Gallery; name had sparked debate

0

 

SINGAPORE – The National Library Board (NLB) said it was aware that the name Syonan Gallery, which it had picked for the newly-revamped National Archives of Singapore (NAS) museum, “could evoke strong emotions”.

The name choice for the museum at the former Ford Factory in Upper Bukit Timah, had sparked an active debate both online and offline with some saying that the word Syonan was fraught with negative connotations since it was the Japanese occupiers’ name for Singapore during World War II.

Singapore was renamed Syonan-to by the Japanese in 1942, following the British surrender. It means “Light of the South”.

Responding to queries from The Straits Times, NLB said that after consulting historians and its advisory panel, it “decided that no other name captured the time and all that it stood for”.

Elaborating on the rationale behind its decision, NLB said: “The period when Singapore was known as Syonan was a very important part of our history. The new name of the gallery reminds us how brittle our sovereignty can be, as Singapore lost not only its freedom, but also its name during the Japanese Occupation.

“It is a sombre reminder not to take our peace and harmony for granted, and to appreciate the need to defend ourselves.”

NLB said that the museum features voices from the darkest part of Singapore’s history so that “future generations will remember what our predecessors went through”.

It added that about 80 per cent of its exhibits are new, and presented in an immersive manner, in order to give voice to the country’s forefathers.

The NAS also urged the public to visit the new exhibition when it opens on Feb 16 so as to learn more about the time period when Singapore was Syonan.

Some members of the public had strong views about the name choice with several calling it “insensitive” and a “ridiculous name that glorifies the occupiers of the war”.

However, others such as Facebook user Andrew Fong, 34, a wealth manager, said: “The new name doesn’t glorify what happened in World War II. I believe it brings people’s attention to an important and dark period of our nation’s history.

“We simply cannot hide from what happened and it should be used to highlight the dangers of what happens when one nation enforce its superiority over others.”

melodyz@sph.com.sg


This article was first published on Feb 10, 2017.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

Image:
Category:
Publication Date:
Saturday, February 11, 2017 – 09:36
Keywords:
Send to mobile app:
Source:

Rotator Image:
Story Type:
Others

Source link

Services along Sengkang LRT disrupted due to power fault

0

SINGAPORE: Train services were disrupted along the East Loop of the Sengkang Light Rail Transit (LRT) on Friday night (Feb 10), after a power outage. Residents near Bakau station also reported hearing a loud “boom” at around 8pm.

The disruption was due to a power fault, according to rail operator SBS Transit in a tweet at about 9.10pm. 

It later said the LRT services in one direction resumed at 8.14pm, 10 minutes after the power fault occurred. “At 8.44pm, power was switched off on the Sengkang East loop for checks. Services in one direction of the Sengkang East loop resumed at 9.19pm. Services will continue in one direction for Sengkang East and West until the end of passenger service hours,” said Ms Tammy Tan, senior vice president for corporate communications at SBS Transit. She added that the company is investigating the cause of the fault.

(Photo: Winnie Goh)

Earlier, a few residents took to social media to report what they heard, with one Twitter user describing a “very loud thunder-like sound” and smoke coming from Bakau station. Some residents came out of their homes to check out the situation, thinking it was a collision.

One commuter said there was no power and the train cabin was dark.

Channel NewsAsia understands that the LRT train stopped in the middle of the track and about 20 commuters were evacuated.

The Singapore Civil Defence Force said it deployed two fire engines, two fire bikes and two support vehicles to the scene. 

Source link

Auction of art, ESM Goh’s personal items to raise funds for TODAY charity

0

SINGAPORE — Special-needs artists will auction off their artworks as part of a fund-raising dinner to be held for the TODAY Enable Fund. The four original artworks and three colour-accented prints by six autistic artists feature nature, animals and architecture. 

The fund’s patron, Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, will also be donating a number of personal items for the charity auction, including a model replica of a pipa, at the dinner.  

The event has drawn strong interest from individuals as well as corporations such as OCBC, Keppel Corp and Tanoto Foundation, a non-profit organisation involved in tertiary education scholarship disbursements, education infrastructure development, and medical research funding in Singapore.

All 30 tables for the dinner, to be held at Grand Mercure Roxy in East Coast on Feb 28, have been taken up. The aim is to raise S$100,000.

Since it was set up last December, many donors have come forward, including individuals, raising more than S$60,000 to date. 

Among the first wave of donors was Ms Anne Chiang, who wanted to give the special-needs community a leg-up after witnessing the challenges faced by a family member who uses a wheelchair. The owner of Active Ageing, which sells assistive hardware to help seniors and persons with disabilities lead an independent life, said, “We experienced first-hand how challenging everyday routines like bathing and going to the toilet can be, not just for the patient but for the caregiver as well.”

Ms Belinda Tanoto, a member of the board of trustees for the Tanoto Foundation, which is taking part in the Feb 28 charity dinner, said, “The TODAY Enable Fund supports a worthy cause which the Tanoto Foundation shares.  We level the playing field when we lend that extra hand to the disadvantaged. And it’s not about charity — it’s about educating, empowering and enhancing lives and maximising potential so every member of society participates in inclusive growth.” 

The TODAY Enable Fund aims to boost the education, skills and employment prospects of persons with disabilities. SG Enable, an agency set up to support persons with disabilities through its programmes, is the fund administrator. 

There are plans to start disbursing from the fund to support its first beneficiaries by the first quarter of this year. 

Other events lined up for the year to help the fund raise its target of S$500,000 to S$1 million a year include a charity golf session and a public fundraising event.

Support the TODAY Enable Fund for the special needs community. Find out more via www.todayonline.com/enable.

If you know of more stories of people with disabilities, email us at news@newstoday.com.sg

Source link

Four winners share S$12 million prize in TOTO Hongbao draw

0

SINGAPORE — Four people will be splitting S$12,001,652, after their numbers were picked in Friday’s (Feb 10) TOTO Hong Bao draw.

The winning numbers were 2, 7, 24, 27, 29, 34 with the additional number of 21. The draw was held at Singapore Pools main branch at 210 Middle Road at 9.30pm.

Each winner will be taking back just slightly over S$3 million in earnings. 

The winning tickets were bought at:

  • Seah Koon Huat – Blk 11A Boon Tiong Rd #01-10 (1 QuickPick System Roll Entry)
  • Singapore Pools Hougang N3 Branch – Blk 322 Hougang Ave 5 #01-70 (1 QuickPick System 7 Entry)
  • Singapore Pools Suntec City – 3 Temasek Boulevard #B1-143 Suntec City Mall (1 QuickPick System 7 Entry)
  • NTUC FP Serangoon Central Hypermart – 23 Serangoon Central #03-42 NEX (1 QuickPick Ordinary Entry)

Prizes not claimed by Aug 9 this year will be channelled to donations and grants managed by the Tote Board.

Source link

Timing of Malaysian challenge on Pedra Branca could be way of "garnering votes" ahead of elections: Experts

0

SINGAPORE: Malaysia’s revival of a decades-old issue with Singapore over the islet of Pedra Branca could be a political manoeuvre ahead of elections, according to researchers and analysts specialising in relations between the neighbours.

The rocky outpost 44km off Singapore’s east coast – referred to by Malaysia as Batu Puteh – was first claimed as Johor territory in 1979. Singapore protested, the matter was brought to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2003, and in 2008 Pedra Branca was ruled as under Singapore’s sovereignty.

On Feb 2 this year however, Malaysia applied to revise the judgment, claiming three newly-unearthed documents in the National Archives of the United Kingdom (UK) demonstrated that officials at the highest levels “did not consider Singapore had sovereignty over Pedra Branca” during the 50s to 60s.

(Photo: TODAY)

Malaysia also said the three documents – found between Aug 4, 2016 and Jan 30, 2017 – were previously confidential and only made publicly available after the 2008 ruling. Channel NewsAsia understands the three documents were released around 2013.

“The timing of the application is quite interesting”, said Dr Mustafa Izzudin, a fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS)-Yusof Ishak Institute. “During Malaysia’s 2013 elections, Pedra Branca was brought up by the opposition to show that the UMNO (United Malays National Organisation) government was weak,” he observed. “Perhaps this time round, UMNO will make use of this to show the Malaysian public that Najib’s leadership is strong in foreign policy and can safeguard the sovereignty of Malaysia.

“The timing does suggest it could be in the minds of policymakers in UMNO that it could be used as a way of garnering votes.”

Noting the emergence of opposition – like the Democratic Action Party (DAP) – in support of reopening the case, Dr Mustafa said: “This could be an issue that rallies the Malaysian people, who are normally quite divided, as one.”

Dr Bridget Welsh, a Southeast Asian political expert at Rome’s John Cabot University, said this opportunity to overturn the ruling would be taken to “full political advantage” by Malaysia. “One cannot get away from the fact that this issue will have domestic political implications and comes at the pre-election period,” she pointed out, adding that Prime Minister Najib Razak will use the issue “for political capital”.

Research analyst David Han of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) echoed this point. “Some politicians could seek to leverage this issue … to boost their success in the coming elections and serve as a distraction from other more pressing domestic issues.”

But Assoc Prof Kevin Blackburn, a historian at the National Institute of Education (NIE), suggested otherwise. ‘’Given the political problems the Barisan Nasional has already, something like this is small stuff that is unlikely to stoke up patriotism that they could possibly benefit from,” he said.

In its application, Malaysia also noted it was submitting the documents before the lapse of a 10-year period for the case to be reviewed, from the judgement date of May 23, 2008.

“It appears to be an act of desperation by the Malaysian team, to find new evidence when time is running out,” said Assoc Prof Blackburn. “They have to go with whatever documents that have come up.”

Dr Mustafa agreed. “It could be an eleventh-hour, last-ditch attempt. They’re trying to see if there are any loopholes,” he said.

“VERY WEAK EVIDENCE”

Malaysia’s full application, released on Fri (Feb 10), showed the first document to be a 1958 telegram sent from the Singapore Governor to British colonial authorities, proposing an international high seas corridor a mile from Pedra Branca. Malaysia said there would have been no need for this if Singapore owned the waters surrounding the island, and concluded that the Governor “did not consider Pedra Branca to be part of Singaporean territory”.

The second document, an incident report from 1958, cited the British navy refraining from aiding a Malaysian vessel near Pedra Branca as it “was still inside Johor territorial waters”. This showed the British military, responsible for Singapore’s defence at the time, “did not view the waters around Pedra Branca as belonging to Singapore”, said Malaysia.

The third document, a map from 1962, delimits Singapore’s territorial waters and shows that they “did not extend to the vicinity of Pedra Branca”, said Malaysia. Further annotations made on the map in 1966 also demonstrate how Singapore regularly reviewed its maritime spaces but “never extended coverage to include Pedra Branca”.

Had the ICJ been aware of such evidence, said Malaysia, it “would have been bound to reach a different conclusion on the question of sovereignty over Pedra Branca”.

Malaysia has also stated it believes its application fulfills requirements under Article 61 of ICJ statutes, which detail requirements for a revision of an earlier decision. These include applying within six months of the discovery of the new fact, the aforementioned 10-year lapse, and making a claim based upon the discovery “of some fact of such a nature as to be a decisive factor” previously unknown to both the ICJ and Malaysia.

The key question now, said Dr Mustafa, is how the new documents square with the pivotal consideration which swung the ICJ’s ruling in Singapore’s favour in 2008.

This was a 1953 letter from Johor’s Acting State Secretary to Singapore’s Colonial Secretary which stated “the Johor government does not claim ownership of Pedra Branca”.

“It is not so much what new evidence Malaysia has stumbled upon, as important as it may be,” said Dr Mustafa. “But much more on how much weight and credibility that new information has when compared to past evidence presented to the ICJ.”

Assoc Prof Blackburn said nothing in Malaysia’s new application was capable of trumping the 1953 letter.

“Having the Johor government saying in black and white it had no sovereignty over the island is much stronger than these documents,” he said. “None of these new documents unequivocally says Pedra Branca is part of Johor … It’s all very weak evidence which doesn’t seem substantial.”

For instance, referring to the 1958 naval incident report, Assoc Prof Blackburn argued that Pedra Branca being surrounded by Johor’s territorial waters did not mean the island was part of Johor.

(Screengrab: ICJ documents)

The same applied to the 1962 map, which he also called the weakest piece of evidence. “It is a map of Singapore and its surrounding waters. Pedra Branca is a long way from Singapore, so how could the map show Pedra Branca?” he questioned.

“If it was large enough to show Pedra Branca it could not possibly show much detail at all … which was clearly its purpose. Pedra Branca is just too far from Singapore to be realistically included, except as an insert.”

(Screengrab: ICJ documents)

He concluded that Malaysia’s best hope was to retrieve original documents from the mid-nineteenth century – when the Horsburgh Lighthouse on Pedra Branca was built – and which would demonstrate any agreements Johor might have entered into with the British.

AN ISSUE OF SOVEREIGNTY

Nonetheless, the reopening of the dispute will not affect Causeway ties as there is an “amicable” sense to proceedings, said Dr Mustafa.

“Malaysia-Singapore relations are at a high now; the best they’ve ever seen,” he pointed out. “Malaysia did inform Singapore about reopening the case, in the spirit of neighbourliness.”

Assoc Prof Blackburn, however, countered that reopening the case went against recent advances in establishing goodwill and cooperation between Malaysia and Singapore. He cited the Kuala Lumpur-Singapore High-Speed Rail project, which he said would require an “unprecedented, perfect relationship” between the two countries to work.

“Still, this is a continuation of the various minor disputes Singapore and Malaysia have had since Singapore broke away from the Malaysian Federation in 1965,” he added. “There are regular disagreements over what is happening in the Johor Strait.”

“The two countries are still bound together by shared languages, history and cultures, but because they are now two separate nation-states, they are naturally concerned with protecting their own sovereignty.”

Said Dr Mustafa: “It’s about sovereignty and adherence to international law, which Singapore is a staunch proponent of. Pedra Branca fits in that narrative, hence our position on it. With Malaysia, it’s also an issue of sovereignty.”

“For both countries, it’s about their territory and what belongs to them.” 

Source link