SINGAPORE: In an age of disruptive change, where technology breakthroughs are rapidly displacing old products, many say innovation is key to levelling the playing field globally and supporting our future economy.
For one, businesses need to seize opportunities to harness creativity to introduce new ideas, products and services that add value to the global marketplace, to remain competitive in this evolving landscape.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GIVES RIGHTS TO INNOVATION TO THE CREATORS
Innovation can be thought of as an idea that adds value to a business and its customer, and the outcome of a process in which something new has been brought to market. In one sense, research and development is nothing without enterprise and commercialisation, and the term innovation captures this idea.
And if innovation is a key driver of economic growth, intellectual property (IP) is then a strategic lever to promote and protect innovation. IP is a broad term that refers to the rights to original ideas developed by a person that brings value and gives rise to new products and services. These could include tangible items such as the final product itself, or its design or logo. Items could also include less tangible concepts that are valuable and marketable, for instance, the recipe to Coca-Cola.
IP gives the creator of these items legal ownership and protection and can take various forms including patents which usually come with a limited duration, trade marks which gives the item a concrete commercial identity, or copyrights which bestows the item with creative ownership which is especially relevant for artistic works like song lyrics and movie scripts that can be massive money generators.
In short, IP incentivises the innovation process by allowing creators to capture a higher share of return on their research investment because they have the rights to their invention, while becoming a key determining factor of an idea’s long-term worth.
Because IP are intangible assets, an IP regime that protects the ownership and rights to these ideas is fundamental for innovative businesses to thrive. IP dictates how ideas can be commercially exploited– they can be owned, sold, licensed, assigned or even gifted like any physical property.
All businesses possess some form of such intangible assets, whether they are aware of it or not. This is especially significant as a business is building itself up, where the ability to identify, protect, manage and exploit its IP can mean the difference between success and failure.
At a launch of the Chinese representative office of the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore in May 2017, IPOS said that it wants to promote Singapore’s IP products and services to “Chinese companies that have set their sights on the dynamic ASEAN region”. (Photo: IPOS)
STRONG PRIVATE-PUBLIC NEXUS IN BOOSTING IP
Singapore has taken bold steps towards building a vibrant knowledge-based and innovation ecosystem that drives a future economy. Many recognise this – Singapore has been ranked 6th in the world and 1st in the Asia-Pacific by the Global Innovation Index 2016, and ranked 2nd in the world by the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Report 2016 – 2017.
Obviously, none of this happened by chance. Government initiatives to help businesses better extract their ideas and inventions and translate them into commercial outcomes while utilising the full potential of their IP have been underway for some time and given a boost. Under the Research, Innovation and Enterprise 2020 Plan (RIE2020), a $19 billion fund has been set aside for the next five years to spur value creation and innovation.
More recently, the establishment of a new $1 billion Makara Innovation Fund to help businesses leverage their IP for growth and international expansion seems to point to an equally strong desire in the business community to leverage innovation.
This move, which trails closely recommendations to build local capacity and strengthen IP commercialisation by the Committee for the Future Economy (CFE), bodes well for Singapore’s plans for a future economy.
This tight coupling between the private and public sector suggests a strong consensus on the way ahead.
IP MANPOWER AND EXPERTISE WILL BE KEY
But what of the means to achieve this? For a system is only as good as its people are. So it is heartening to read that a newly updated IP hub masterplan also has plans to double the number of skilled IP experts to 1,000 over the next five years.
Indeed, manpower capabilities have been recognised as a crucial enabler to support the key strategic outcomes of Singapore’s IP hub vision to generate benefits for innovators, businesses and the IP services sector, and create high value job opportunities.
To create a dynamic IP ecosystem for the future economy, more players and services are needed to service the IP needs of today’s technology-rich yet asset-light businesses. A new generation of IP experts is needed to support this growth.
To ramp up innovation among businesses, the Committee on the Future Economy recommended strengthening Singapore’s intellectual property (IP) ecosystem and providing more support for local entrepreneurs. (Photo: CNA)
For now, IP expertise is in short supply in Singapore as well as many other countries. The development of IP expertise requires multi-disciplinary skills-sets that straddle the interface of business, technology, and law. Needed skill-sets include IP management skills in various phases of the innovation life-cycle, including creation, protection, and exploitation. IP professionals are expected to be responsive to opportunities to translate innovation and IP into business or commercial outcomes.
There is great potential for good jobs in this IP market. A study conducted on industries in Singapore with an above-average usage of IP shows such sectors can contribute substantially to the economy and employ about 42.5 per cent of the workforce, with jobs in these industries paying a premium income of 29 per cent more than those in other industries.
A PROMISING FUTURE ECONOMY
The future economy, which will be driven by innovation, is promising. Singapore is well-positioned to provide a unique value proposition as an IP gateway to Asia and beyond.
With its IP expertise and professionals to aid businesses, I am confident that businesses will be equipped to transform their ideas into valuable and commercial outcomes, which will in turn create high-value employment opportunities for our people.
Eric Gan Kok Wah is head of the Intellectual Property and Innovation Management Programme in the School of Business at Singapore University of Social Sciences. Source link
Seize your Sundays! With $5 off your JustGrab ride every Sunday, there’s no excuse to waste your weekend. Get off your sofa and start filling your Sundays with new and exciting events that you’ll be talking about all week long.
SINGAPORE — Set for an expansion as it marks its 15th anniversary this year, it is easy to forget that the multi-million dollar Esplanade was opened in October 2002 to huge scepticism.
Would it work as an arts venue? Was the “durian” design too avant-garde and lacking in appeal to the man-in-the-street? Would Singaporeans and arts and music practitioners alike embrace it and make it their own?
Today, the Esplanade — shimmering silver spikes and all — has become an icon in the Marina Bay area, drawing huge international names in the music, dance and theatre scenes.
The journey for the Esplanade began in 1979, when the late President and then-Minister for Culture Ong Teng Cheong brought to Parliament his intention to create an arts centre “to provide more facilities for the mushrooming of local cultural activities”.
The official announcement for the venue was issued in 1990, in a climate of economic uncertainty when Singapore was just coming out of its first post-independence recession. Murmurs of discontent started then. And when construction began in 1996, the murmurs grew into a clamour.
The Esplanade’s chief executive, Mr Benson Puah, said: “The public questioned why we were doing this, and who (the complex) was for.”
The presumption by many was that “it’s obviously not for me”, he added. People assumed it was for “the cultural elite”.
Arts practitioners were initially excited by the idea of a huge arts complex — one venue with a big theatre, as well as potential mid-sized and small spaces for various productions.
But in 1994, it was announced that the Esplanade would have to be built in two phases because of the scale and cost of the project. The largest spaces — the Concert Hall and the Theatre, with a capacity of 1,600 and 1,950 respectively — as well as the smaller Recital and Theatre Studios were to be built first. It fell to Singapore’s Ambassador-at-Large Professor Tommy Koh, who was then chairman of National Arts Committee and a member of the steering committee, to announce that the development of the medium-sized space was to be put on hold, with no definite date set.
The Esplanade’s “durian” design taking shape. Following the groundbreaking ceremony on 11 August 1996, construction of the arts venue began, and took about six years to complete. It was officially opened by then President S R Nathan on 12 October 2002. Photos: Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay
According to Prof Koh, he was the “bad guy” who had to break this news to the local arts groups, for whom a mid-sized space was important for them to upscale their works.
“Many of my artist friends were very disappointed. Some felt that I had betrayed them. Others wondered whether there would ever be a phase two,” he said.
Add to that the fact that the final figure for the complex was to be just over S$600 million, and there was a public storm.
Even its architecture was a question mark, with many saying it was an “ugly concrete blob”. Those such as Mr Vikas M Gore from DP Architects, the company behind the Esplanade’s design, remember how the building was first called “the Durian” as “a joke and a criticism”.
Mr Gore, who was the project director in charge of the Esplanade project, added: “I have a collection of other names it was called, not all of them printable.”
Mr Puah felt all this keenly.
“During the period before we opened, we knew that there was much we needed to do to win back our people,” said Mr Puah. “The first thing we asked ourselves was: Why are we really here?
“The answer was clear for all of us. We are here to serve our people through the arts … We know no amount of talking could change anybody’s mind until we opened, and demonstrated where our hearts were,” he said.
THE LOW POINTS
Today the Esplanade is an iconic structure known for a diverse programme that encompasses contemporary as well as traditional forms of music, dance and theatre. Say “Mosaic Music Festival”, and one immediately thinks of the year the Esplanade brought in American hip-hop trio N.E.R.D. The Huayi — Chinese Festival of the Arts has seen heavyweight names such as thespian Anthony Wong taking to the stage not once, but twice, at the building. Its da:ns series has seen major international productions such as Giselle and Don Quixote while most recently, The Third Space showcased works by Cultural Medallion recipient Lim Fei Shen.
On the local front, the Esplanade is known for pushing boundaries. The centre commissioned two Singapore arts groups — Singapore Dance Theatre and Singapore Repertory Theatre — to produce Reminiscing the Moon and Forbidden City respectively, two large-scale works which were part of the centre’s opening festival line-up.
In the early years, however, some remember that the Esplanade’s halls were empty. Ms Nathalie Ribette, artistic and executive director and founder of Sing’theatre said: “In the beginning, I had doubts on whether the public would visit the Esplanade unless they have had paid for a ticket to a show. In the initial years, the corridors were often empty.”
The Esplanade was also hosting international shows such as Singin’ In The Rain (2002), Oliver! (2003) and Mamma Mia! (2004).
This led to worry that the Esplanade’s programmers had “high performing standards”, and that local productions would not stand a chance, according to Mr Chin Choy Liew, company manager of dance company Frontier Danceland and the general manager of Singapore Symphony Orchestra from 1999 to 2004.
“The Esplanade was quite selective (then) about groups going into the facilities to stage performances. Amateur groups, school groups had difficulty getting into the complex,” he said.
However, according to Mr Puah, there was always a focus on smaller and local arts groups.
“This may not have been apparent, especially in the early years, as the programmes which took place in our big venues then were often international presentations, such as popular musicals. These tended to be given more prominence by the media and thus, may have given our artists and the public the impression that only international artists performed at the centre,” he said.
The Esplanade, however, found a turning point in public perception through an unexpected avenue: Concerts.
A MUSICAL FORCE, CHANGING PERCEPTIONS
The Concert Hall is Esplanade’s crown jewel, which seats 1,630 and another 197 in the gallery. It was chosen by Hamburg-based building data company Emporis in 2014 as one of the 15 most beautiful concert halls in the world. Photo: Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay
The arts venue quickly became a ground-breaking force in music. In the 1990s, the Indoor and National Stadiums were where big acts would play shows.
But with a state-of-the-art sound system and acoustics, the Esplanade became a welcome alternative. It brought in the great American jazz chanteuse Shirley Horn in 2005, American singer-songwriter Jason Mraz in his Singapore debut in 2006, popular American trumpeter Chris Botti in 2008, and celebrated Canadian singer k.d. lang in 2011.
But The Esplanade in 2002 also decided to champion Singapore music, hosting its first Baybeats festival then. The free, three-day annual festival is dedicated to alternative rock and local bands.
Mr Mohamed Hanis Isahak, bass player of experimental music group Sub:Shaman, said he initially thought that the Esplanade was an “atas” place just for cultural shows. That is, until he went to the first Baybeats.
“I experienced Force Vomit, My Squared Circle, Fishtank, Moods, and so many more bands that weekend,” he said. “It had a profound impact on me.”
Mr Hanis, 29, a project manager, added: “I still check out the Esplanade programmes and discover many cool bands from Singapore and the region. The programming has continued to stay on the pulse of our independent music scene.”
Fronting the 300m long waterfront along Marina Bay, the Esplanade outdoor theatre can seat 450 people and accommodate up to 600 standing. The space hosts a diverse range of performances from music to dance and theatre, which can be enjoyed under the night sky. Photo: Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay
And then came the Mosaic Music Festival in 2005.
“From the first half of 2000s … it was clear that Esplanade was willing to go out on a limb and invite artists from different genres, known as well as emerging,” said Mr Yeow Kai Chai, former music reviewer for The Straits Times Life!. “The main vehicle was the Mosaic Music Festival, which was responsible for cultivating the contemporary music fan’s taste, and introducing acclaimed foreign acts such as Joanna Newsom and Rickie Lee Jones”
The Mosaic Music Festival debuted in 2005 but saw its last installment in 2014, despite tremendous success. Mr Puah said the festival ended because it had “served its purpose”. Newer festivals such as the St Jeromes Laneway Festival, which first came to Singapore in 2012, were springing up.
“Its success was building audiences for many different genres and forms of music, to the extent that commercial promoters could actually take it on,” Mr Puah said, adding that passing the torch to others has always been his intent for Mosaic.
The brand, however, lives on. Last year, the Mosaic Associate Artist programme was launched along with the venue’s new Annexe Studio. The aim: To offer artists here more dedicated support by giving them opportunities for residencies and production support. The programme is tied to the Esplanade’s new Annexe Studio, a space for rehearsals, performances and the like.
Singapore jazz musician Chok Kerong and instrumental metal band In Each Hand A Cutlass are part of the programme.
The Esplanade had also debuted one of Singapore’s largest local music festivals, Baybeats, in 2002. The free, three-day annual festival is dedicated to alternative rock and local bands.
IN THEATRE
“Forbidden City: Portrait of an Empress” was first staged by Singapore Repertory Theatre at the opening festival of Esplanade in 2002 and then later restaged twice in 2003 and 2006, due to popular demand. The musical will return to the Esplanade again in August 2017. Photo: Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay
Since its opening, the Esplanade managed to gain traction with local theatre groups.
Those like Apsaras Arts, the Indian classical dance theatre company, have received a huge boost thanks to support from the arts venue.
Creative and managing director Aravinth Kumarasamy, 51, said that around 2002 — when the Esplanade opened — was when the dance company set its sights on transforming itself into a more professional body.
It got its start primarily as a dance school in 1977, but was focused on small, ad-hoc productions up to the early 2000s.
The Esplanade allowed the company to work with them, “co-producing … productions, and programming the Company in its annual festivals”, said Mr Kumarasamy, who has been with Apsaras Arts since 1990.
“Over the years, the company has gained experience in creating and presenting works in its world-class venue, working with professional technical resources,” he added. All that experience led them to understand what it took to be on a world stage. Working with the Esplanade “enabled the company to build its brand as an international Indian dance company”, he added.
A number of Apsaras Arts’ projects have gone on international tours after premiering at the Esplanade, he noted. Among them is Angkor, co-produced by the Esplanade. The curtain-raiser performance for Esplanade’s annual Indian arts festival – Kalaa Utsvam 2013, it brought together artists from five different countries. Mr Kumarasamy describes it as “one mega production” that went on to show around the region. Other works from Apsaras Arts have also gone on to show in London and India.
“Partnering with Esplanade brought us new audiences,” said Mr Kumarasamy. “The initial perception was that the Esplanade would only focus in presenting top international works. But it has been true to its vision of being there for all.”
Likewise, the partnership with Esplanade has led to international collaborations for SRT, said Ms Charlotte Nors, executive director at the company. Such collaborations saw them working with the Royal Shakespeare Company on King Lear (2007), and Sam Mendes’ trans-atlantic The Bridge Project, which famously brought in Richard III, starring Academy Award-winner Kevin Spacey, 2011.
Today, the Esplanade continues to champion small groups. The Teng Company, a small arts company focusing on Singaporean Chinese music, credits the Esplanade for pushing them forward. In 2013, the Esplanade commissioned an ensemble show for its smaller Recital Studio space. Last year, programmers practically arm-twisted the company into holding its first Concert Hall show.
Dr Samuel Wong, pipa player and board member of the company, recalls how the ensemble was worried that tickets would not sell — but they did. The one-night-only show last year (2016), directed by Singapore theatre icon Glen Goei, “sold like hotcakes”, said Dr Wong.
COMPETITION RULES
The proposed site of the new mid-sized theatre at the Esplanade. Budgeted at S$30 million, it will be able to seat up to 550 people, and offer the arts venue more flexibility in terms of programming. Photo: Mugilan Rajasegeran/TODAY
Despite its roaring success, the Esplanade is no longer the only premiere theatre in town. The opening of the Marina Bay Sands (MBS) theatres in 2010 has meant that top international acts and productions also flock to that venue, just across the river.
Frontier Danceland’s artistic director Low Mei Yoke said that since then, she has noticed that large-scale musicals are held there, rather than at the Esplanade.
Long-running and popular block-buster commercial productions at MasterCard Theatres at MBS include Disney’s The Lion King, which made its South-east Asia debut in March 2011, and award-winning West End musical Wicked (2016).
Mr Puah is “mindful” of competition, noting that “MBS makes enough net profit to make Esplanade all over again”.
But he added that “I see every venue as adding onto the ecosystem. In business, one tends to destroy the competition”. The Esplanade has taken the view “that we would support different venues, because they would attract different audiences”, he said.
There are those such as Ong Keng Sen, director of the Singapore International Festival of Arts, who feel that the Esplande has “hit a glass ceiling”. His worry: Over-centralisation.
“I have heard audiences say that they are tired of going to the Esplanade again, even if they are seeing different things,” he said.
He encourages arts groups to look beyond the Esplanade and experiment with different spaces.
“There have been very experimental projects in Europe for example, where people ‘trade’ buildings,” he said. “So, I work in your building and you work in my building.”
He suggested that the Esplanade ought to be radical, and “change identities for a season” with, say, the National Gallery Singapore. This would shake things up and give it a chance to reshape itself.
Acclaimed local playwright Alfian bin Sa’at said: “Even as the Esplanade makes resources available for local theatre makers, it should not be seen as the only entity in town with the capability to mount festivals and public programmes.”
Although Mr Puah recognises that tastes have changed, and that the Esplanade is entering into a new season of life, he said that the content and programmes Esplanade is able to present is still at “the tip of a very large iceberg”.
He said: “The next 15 years (should not be) a straight line growth for us, it has to be a rejuvenation. Do not expect things to stay the same. The new generation has totally different expectations … from what we do now … I think that’s hugely exciting because culture doesn’t stand still, does it? And we are not.”
A pyrotechnics spectacular lights up Marina Bay to celebrate the opening of Singapore’s first purpose-built performing arts centre. The highlight of the opening celebrations was a 23-day festival that featured 1,300 artists from 22 countries and attracted more than one million visitors to its over 600 performances. Photo: Esplanade – Theatres on the Bay
To start with, that mid-sized theatre that caused so much consternation in the beginning has finally been announced. The news came last month that it is set to be a 550-seater on the waterfront, costing S$30 million and to be completed in 2021.
“With a waterfront theatre, there is so much more we can explore. We have served people as best as we could with large and small venues,” said Mr Puah. “Many works we have (put on) are (actually) for a mid-size theatre. So, the possibilities (for the future) are mind-boggling. I firmly believe it will be a game-changer for the scene. It is actually going to be the engine for growth for us.”
The Cheong family had just arrived in Tokyo, Japan for a family holiday when Mr Cheong suffered from a cardiac arrest.
Screengrab of the appeal posted on crowdfunding portal Give.Asia on Friday (Apr 28).
(Updated: )
SINGAPORE: What was meant to be a family trip marking the end of a difficult period took a turn for the worse for Eileen Cheong last week.
Her family had arrived in Tokyo, Japan on Apr 19 to celebrate after her mother’s cancer was declared to be in remission. Just as their trip was about to start, her father suffered a cardiac arrest and was admitted into a local hospital.
In aheartfelt appealposted on crowdfunding portal Give.Asia on Friday (Apr 28), 25-year-old Eileen explained that she had turned to the platform as she had “exhausted all resources”. Her father’s medical bills were rising “exponentially”, she said, adding that his first night in hospital alone cost S$40,000, and every subsequent night in the ICU would be an additional S$10,000.
“We were told that his heart was beating irregularly and stopped for an extended period of time, causing his brain to suffer permanent damage,” she wrote. “According to the Japanese doctors, it is impossible to determine how long my dad will remain comatose. It could be a week, a year, or forever.”
“We are now one week into his hospitalisation and owe the hospital approximately S$120,000 (and counting),” she said.
Eileen said her father does not hold a life insurance policy. His travel insurers also said the Cheong family is unlikely to have a successful claim as his collapse was due to a pre-existing heart condition.
Besides escalating medical costs, Eileen said they hope to take her father home to Singapore, where her family will have access to subsidised healthcare and financial aid, as well as emotional support from their loved ones. This would however add to their bills, as medical evacuation could cost an additional S$120,000.
Thanks to kind netizens however, things could be looking up for the Cheong family – their S$250,000 target was hit on Saturday afternoon, after nearly 3,000 people sent in donations online, and privately, to the family. The crowdfunding page had been down intermittently since Friday due to heavy traffic to the site.
The campaign has since ended. In an update on Saturday, Eileen said her family is in the midst of arranging for her father’s air evacuation back to Singapore, as he is currently in a stable condition.
“We did not expect to raise the sums in such a short amount of time (for which we are truly grateful), and we are also very thankful to the friends, my ex-schools and the companies that have reached out to offer us advice and help (be it financial, or arrangements for the medical evacuation),” she said.
“Without your help, we would never have raised this amount in such a short period of time. In particular, this would not have been possible without my friends, who had put forth the idea of and continually persuaded me to crowdfund for this cause despite my initial reluctance.”
SINGAPORE: Team LKT, led by Mr Lim Kia Tong, will head the leadership of the Football Association of Singapore (FAS), after defeating the challenge led by Mr Bill Ng on Saturday (Apr 29).
The 64-year-old, who is a criminal litigation lawyer, overcame his rival Mr Ng from Team Game Changers by 17 votes after all of the 44 FAS affiliates had cast their vote at Black Box Auditorium.
Mr Lim Kia Tong and some of his team members speaking to the media. (Photo: Noor Farhan)
Mr Lim’s team won the election 30-13, with 1 spoilt vote, FAS confirmed via its social media channels.
With Team LKT winning the FAS election on Saturday, the new council will consist of Bernard Tan as the FAS’ deputy president, with Edwin Tong, Teo Hock Seng, S Thavaneson and Razali Saad taking up their vice-president roles. Individual council member candidates from Team LKT’s slate – Mr Forrest Li, Mr Dinesh Nair and Mr Darwin Jalil – were also voted in.
As Team LKT did not have a required female candidate on its slate, Tanjong Pager United women’s player Sharda Parvin has been deemed elected by acclamation, FAS said.
TIME TO UNITE: GRACE FU
Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu said after the election result was out that the local football fraternity should put aside its differences and unite to work together for its future.
“With the conclusion of its first election, the new leadership of FAS should engage its stakeholders, and rebuild trust and confidence with the stakeholders and the public,” she wrote in a Facebook post.
“There are pressing issues for the FAS leadership team to address, including the development of local football and the future of the S.League.
“It is critical that the new FAS leadership prioritise the review of its internal governance structures and processes, to implement a more robust system going forward,” Ms Fu added.
Sport Singapore, too, issued a statement on Saturday wishing the new council all the best in leading the local football fraternity.
CEO Lim Teck Yin also said: “As a registered charity and Institution of a Public Character (IPC), the FAS must maintain a high standard of regulatory compliance and best practice. Future public funding support will very much depend on this, and the confidence in the FAS’ strategies, plans and actions to develop football in Singapore and our national teams.” Source link
PHILIPPINE President Rodrigo Duterte kicked off the ASEAN Summit on Saturday by evoking his brutal and highly-criticised anti-drug campaign.
In his opening speech to the 30th annual regional summit, Duterte called on the bloc’s leaders to work together to end the illegal drug trade.
“We must be resolute in realising a drug-free ASEAN… I have seen how drugs have ended hopes, dreams, future and even lives of countless people, especially the youth,” said the President.
“The illegal drug trade apparatus is massive, but it is not impregnable. With political will and cooperation, it can be dismantled, it can be destroyed before it destroys our societies,” he told members, as reported by ABS-CBN News.
Many commentators believed Duterte’s bloody war on drugs would be largely ignored and brushed under the carpet at the summit as it was conspicuously missing from a draft statement to be issued by the Philippine president at the end of Saturday’s summit. But in placing his campaign centre stage in his opening remarks of the regional meet, Duterte has shown that he will not be fazed by the fierce international criticism he has faced in recent weeks.
International rights group Amnesty International called the Philippines’ chairing of the summit against the “horrifying” backdrop of the brutal war on drugs a “scandal”, and called for the government to make “independent and effective investigations into unlawful killings an immediate priority.”
A policeman installs a police line as his colleague inspects the body of a suspected drug pusher, who was shot and killed by unidentified men, along an alley in Quezon city, metro Manila, Philippines March 7. Source: Reuters
On Tuesday, a New York Timeseditorial called for the world to condemn Duterte and to consider imposing economic sanctions on the Philippines to force the president to answer for his role in the killings.
It is currently estimated police and unidentified gunmen have killed more than 9,000 suspected drug users and dealers in the anti-drug crackdown.
Police claim to have killed 2,690 people, but this number doesn’t include the drug war victims Duterte calls “collateral damage” – including children killed by stray police bullets.
Duterte’s opening statement comes just days after Filipino lawyer Jude Sabio formally asked the International Criminal Court on Monday to charge the president and 11 officials with mass murder and crimes against humanity over the extrajudicial killings.
On top of this, the embattled president is also facing an impeachment bid at home.
As he continues to court a storm of criticism from international governments and the media, some feel Duterte may get a more sympathetic audience within the ASEAN leadership.
“The ratbag of dictators, autocrats and juntas that dominate ASEAN’s ranks perceive transparency, accountability and rule of law as existential threats rather than foundations of good governance,” said Phelim Kine of Human Rights Watch, as reported by The PhilStar.
“Expect ASEAN leaders to yet again throw the human rights of an Asian country under the bus by remaining silent about Duterte’s abusive drug war by implicitly or explicitly invoking the organization’s ‘non-interference’ principle”.
SINGAPORE: While plans for a national bicycle sharing scheme have been scrapped, grassroots organisations and companies have been working in tandem to make cycling the preferred way to get around.
On Saturday (Apr 29), Jurong-Clementi Town Council was the latest to hop on with the launch of a one-year pilot bicycle sharing programme. This is in conjunction with three bicycle rental companies that recently made inroads into the Singapore market – Mobike, oBike, and ofo.
As part of the agreement – the town council is providing 30 bicycle parking zones for 120 bicycles around Jurong Central. These zones – yellow rectangle boxes – are mainly for bicycles belonging to the three operators, and can be found in areas like under HDB estates or near Chinese Gardens MRT station.
The town council said it will also add more bicycle racks – but these will be paid for by the companies themselves.
In return, the companies have to, among other things, ensure that those who rent the bicycles park them in the right place, and not obstruct common areas in the neighbourhood. The rise of dockless bicycle sharing – where users do not have to return bicycles to fixed stations, has given rise to horror stories of bicycles blocking letterboxes, corridors, or fire exit routes.
Bicycles from different bike-sharing service providers at one of the new parking spaces. (Photo: Kenneth Lim)
As part of the agreement – companies have to remove bicycles that are illegally parked within four hours, if alerted by the town council between 8.30am and 7pm, and before 7am the following day if they are notified after 7pm.
All three companies say they have incentive schemes and systems to encourage right riding and parking behaviour.
The companies also have to provide third-party insurance covering accidents or bicycle damages and provide travelling or cycling pattern information to the authorities, among others.
SMALL EVENT, WIDE IMPLICATIONS
Jurong MP Ang Wei Neng said the launch of the pilot on Saturday was a “small event”, but has wide implications. For example, if successful, the scheme may be extended to all seven divisions in Jurong GRC, Yuhua, and Bukit Batok SMC, and may serve “as a reference for other town councils”.
“We want to embrace the bicycle-sharing scheme rather than rejecting it,” he said. “We want our residents to enjoy the convenience of rental bicycles right at the void deck without the disamenities.
If this scheme is successful, it will effectively replace the National Bicycle Sharing Scheme supposedly to be launched at the Jurong Lake District in late 2017 but was canned.”
Mr Ang added: “The whole of Jurong and the whole of Singapore is watching this pilot scheme closely.”
SINGAPORE: At the birthday parties and family celebrations Nigel* used to attend, alcohol was freely available. He was then in his early teens.
“It was just there, and the uncles would say, come here and have a drink young man, and we would just pick it up, no permission needed,” he recalled. “It was all about being funny and jovial.
“I just gulped it down, and that was it, but over the years I started to like it.”
But this early introduction to the pleasures of alcohol was the start of his journey down the road of addiction: At his peak, Nigel was drinking about 36 to 40 cans of beer a day.
ALCOHOL ADDICTION ‘NO DIFFERENT’ FROM DRUG ADDICTION
Although it is socially acceptable to drink alcohol, addiction specialists Channel NewsAsia spoke to say it can be a lethal drug.
“Because alcohol is so easily available and part of our culture, many people may be drinking at dangerous levels without seeking help, as it has already become part of their lifestyle,” said Dr Gomathinayagam Kandasami, chief of the Addiction Medicine Department of the National Addictions Management Service (NAMS).
“As a doctor, I can say that whether you develop a drug addiction or alcohol addiction, there is no difference,” he added. “Addiction destroys you and your family, and increases the risk of dying early.”
He also cited statistics from the 2010 Singapore Mental Health Study, which showed that 96.2 per cent of those affected by alcohol abuse did not seek help. According to the study, which are the only local statistics available on the issue at a national level, alcohol abuse is also one of the three most common mental health disorders in Singapore.
Singapore youths drinking beer. (Photo: Marcus Mark Ramos)
The abuse usually begins in a social setting, said Dr Thomas Lee, consultant psychiatrist at the Resilienz Clinic.
“I very rarely find patients who start their drinking alone,” he noted. “Sometimes, they are also introduced to alcohol by their parents or family members, and they find they like the taste of it.”
But when their drinking starts to interfere with their daily life, where they may not be able to go to work without having a drink first … that’s when it starts to become a problem.”
Dr Kandasami added that drinking large amounts of alcohol in a short span of time – for example, four or five drinks in half an hour – is one precursor to problem drinking. If left unchecked, he said, problem drinking can develop into addiction.
“If they don’t drink, they will develop a lot of withdrawal symptoms,” he explained. “They could get shakes or sweats when they wake up in the morning, so they end up drinking a can of beer to start their day.”
And, because it takes time for the addiction to develop, both doctors said the patients they usually see have been drinking heavily for many years before they are compelled – usually by family members, or when they hit a crisis – to seek help.
They noted that the patients they see are typically older – between the mid-thirties to their fifties – and most had started drinking in their teens or early twenties.
“By that time,” said Dr Lee, “they would already have damaged their liver, or their memory has started failing.”
NIPPING THE PROBLEM IN THE BUD
This is why nightspots, bars and liquor importers hope to address problem drinking where it all begins: In social settings.
The Singapore Nightlife Business Association (SNBA) has teamed up with the European Chamber of Commerce’s (EuroCham) wine, spirits and beer committee to form an alliance aimed at promoting responsible drinking.
“We want to make sure that Singapore is perceived as a safe place to go out at night, that people don’t find an environment where others are drinking more than they should,” said general manager of Moet Hennessy Diageo Singapore David White.
The company imports and distributes premium wines and spirits, and is on the EuroCham wine, spirits and beer committee.
“As suppliers, it’s also the right thing to do, because we want to make sure we are self-regulating the industry and that in the long term, we are not impacted negatively in any way,” he added.
The alliance, named the Singapore Alliance for Responsible Drinking, plans to help nip problem drinking in the bud by training bar staff to recognise signs so they can handle the situation appropriately.
Bar staff at Clarke Quay nightspot Shanghai Dolly preparing a bucket of beer. (Photo: Lianne Chia)
The alliance also hopes to roll out a standardised training programme across the industry, taking the best of overseas training programmes and adapting them to the Singapore context.
One programme they are looking at is the Training for Intervention Procedures (TIPS) from the US, which is a skills-based programme designed to prevent intoxication, underage drinking and drunk driving.
SNBA’s vice president Edward Chia explained that even while some establishments may already have in-house training programmes for their staff, the training can be “highly inconsistent”.
“Different companies would have different approaches, different policies, but to me, that creates an inconsistency in the nightlife industry in Singapore. So we hope to have a standard programme that is executed and delivered to almost the majority of operators in Singapore who have a liquor or a public entertainment license,” he said.
A TIPS pilot was also carried out in 2015 for nightspots in Clarke Quay, to great effect.
“Since we did the TIPS training, our statistics showed that over-intoxication-related incidents fell by 30 per cent in our clubs,” noted Mr Gordon Foo, managing director of Shanghai Dolly, adding that previously, his staff learnt from on-the-job experience and by asking more senior staff for advice.
“I think TIPS training provides standardised, formalised guidelines for everybody to follow, so they know what to do at the same time.”
Shanghai Dolly security staff Mohd Fairuz said he has gained confidence from the TIPS training. (Photo: Lianne Chia)
Shanghai Dolly security staff Mohd Fairuz has about 10 years of experience in the industry. His job involves patrolling the premises looking out for rowdy drinkers, or small groups drinking large amounts of alcohol.
“There was no training given previously and l learnt everything from my seniors,” he said.
“Previously, we hesitated to confront customers who were rowdy, because I thought if a bouncer approaches a customer, it looks bad for them, like they are doing something wrong.
“But after TIPS training, I realised that it’s all about our body language and how we approach them. If we approach them smiling, it shouldn’t be a problem,” he added.
He added: “I’ve learnt to engage rather than confront customers, get to know them, and now, some of us are friends.”
MORE AWARENESS NEEDED
It took almost four decades for Nigel, who is now in his fifties, to kick the habit. Late last year, he voluntarily checked himself into the inpatient detox programme at NAMS at the urging of his wife and a good friend.
“I realised that after so long drinking, something is wrong,” he said. “I’d always thought life was good to me, but then why would I need to keep going to get a beer just to calm myself?
“I was basically drinking away all my money, not meeting up with appointments, not seeing friends, just being reclusive and always looking for money to buy beer … And when I was sitting alone gulping beer after beer, I started thinking about jumping and ending my life … but I never had the courage to do that.”
He is grateful that his wife realised there was a problem and called a good friend for help. “I was in a stupor, and he literally dragged me out of bed, and got me showered and shaved,” he recalled.
After treatment at NAMS, Nigel is still on medication, but has been sober for the last seven months.
He noted that it will definitely be helpful for nightspots to give their staff formal training on spotting the signs of problem drinking. “The impact will be there, slowly and gradually.”
But he added that outside the drinking establishments, there also needs to be more awareness about the dangers of alcohol abuse in the community.
“The families should be educated, and the community as well,” he said. “We talk about gambling, about drugs … but alcoholism is a big problem in Singapore.”
A Traffic Police officer stopping a motorist for an alcohol consumption test. (Photo: Singapore Police Force)
Both doctors concurred, with Dr Lee adding that this education should start from young.
“At the school level, children are more aware of sex education, and they don’t know as much about the harms of alcohol,” he said, adding that even children as young as 12 can start drinking.
He also suggested that existing messaging about drinking in moderation be tweaked, noting that currently, the focus appears to be on drink driving. “We don’t see messages outside of this, for example, the health hazards of drinking too much.”
Dr Kandasami noted that much has already done by the Government to restrict the sale and use of alcohol in public places. But more could be done, he said, particularly in the messaging towards young people.
“The messaging for drug abuse is very strong, where you go to prison and ruin your life, but when it comes to alcohol, I’m not sure the messaging is strong enough, particularly for binge drinking or underage drinking,” he said. “Maybe the Government can make it clearer – that your drinking problem will not be tolerated.”
For the first time ever, Giant Tampines is holding a warehouse clearance sale! Selected household and home appliances are going at up to 60% for 4 days only from 28 Apr – 1 May 2017