3 directors serving time for criminal breach of trust unaffected by landmark City Harvest ruling

0
204

They were convicted and sentenced before the interpretation of section 409 of the Penal Code was changed last year, says Law Minister K Shanmugam.

shanmugam parly

Home Affairs and Law Minister K Shanmugam speaking in Parliament on March 20, 2018 (Screengrab)

SINGAPORE: The public prosecutor does not intend to file any applications in respect of three directors currently serving time for criminal breach of trust (CBT), despite a recent ruling excluding the embezzling City Harvest Church (CHC) leaders from receiving similar punishment.

“All three had pleaded guilty under section 409. They were convicted and sentenced before the High Court changed the interpretation of the law regarding section 409 of the Penal Code,” Law Minister K Shanmugam explained in Parliament on Tuesday (Mar 20).

Section 409 of the Penal Code concerns heavier punishments for certain groups of CBT offenders, and includes life imprisonment.

Last year the High Court ruled that “agents” as defined by Section 409 does not include the following: Directors of corporations, governing board members, key officers of charities or officers of societies.

It thus could not be applied to the CHC leaders who misused over S$50 million of funds in a fraud designed to embellish the pop music ventures of Ho Yeow Sun, the wife of church founder Kong Hee.

Kong, Chew Eng Han, John Lam, Sharon Tan, Tan Ye Peng and Serina Wee could only be convicted and sentenced under section 406 instead, which carries up to seven years in jail.

Mr Shanmugam told the House that the three directors convicted and sentenced under section 409 are presently on community-based programmes – including home detentions – and scheduled for release in a few weeks, somewhere between May and June of this year.

“There are in fact 15 persons currently serving sentences for section 409 offences,” he clarified. “Of these 15 persons, three were … directors. The remaining 12 who comprise eight professional agents of one sort or another – insurance agents and so on – one attorney, and three public servants.

“The 12, as I explained yesterday, they are not affected by the ruling of ‘directors’.”

Mr Shanmugam was referring to his response to a parliamentary question on Monday, where in similar fashion he noted that the 12 “were convicted, sentenced before the High Court reviewed and changed the interpretation of the law regarding section 409, and the Public Prosecutor does not intend to file any applications in respect of them”.

Source link